Conventional Wisdom Scorecard / Getting Thru The Spin

In every big election, conventional wisdom that forms before the election often becomes the accepted truth for what happened even after the election is over -- even when the facts prove otherwise.  Let's examine the developed conventional wisdom in the media and among those who want to take credit or give blame for what might happen in the next few hours as results come in.  Consider this as you watch coverage in the mainstream media and in the blogs (both of whom have opinion trends that often move in packs), and remember it when you see everyone handing out blame or taking credit for what happens.

THIS IS A NATIONAL ELECTION.  Depends on How You Look At It.
THE NUMBER ONE ISSUE IS IRAQ.  Nope.
LIBERAL POWER IS THE REASON FOR DEMOCRATIC VICTORIES.  Not Completely True.
REPUBLICANS LOST THIS ELECTION. DEMOCRATS DID NOT WIN IT.  Wrong.

THIS IS A NATIONAL ELECTION.  Wrong.  Only about 10% of Americans even have the chance to have a say in who controls the House of Representatives.  Because of gerrymandering in the 435-member House, there are really competitive races in 40-50 seats.  That's a tiny number!  On the other hand, according to CNN exit polling, this is a national election in most voters' minds, even those who aren't among the lucky 10% whose vote for control of the House really matters.

THE NUMBER ONE ISSUE IS IRAQ.  Wrong.
 Also according to CNN exit polling, Iraq is ranking fourth (37%) among issues identified by voters, coming in behind corruption (42%), terrorism (40%), and the economy (39%).

LIBERAL POWER IS THE REASON FOR DEMOCRATIC VICTORIES.  Not Completely True.
Let's take Democratic candidates in key swing races for both the Senate and House.  There are more moderate to conservative Democrats running than true-blue liberals in key districts, so those who are claiming the "left" or the "base" or the "real Democrats" deserve the most (or only) credit for delivering this election are demanding a false choice between swing voters and the most loyal voters that has failed Democrats for so long.  It is the loss or victory of these moderate Democrats that will determine the control of the Congress: Jim Webb for Virginia Senate (former Reagan official), Harold Ford for Tennessee Senate (an unapologetic member of the conservative Democratic Leadership Council), Ken Lucas for Kentucky House (has not committed to supporting Nancy Pelosi for Speaker), Heath Shuler for N.Carolina House (not pro-choice).  There are many others, both liberal and moderate, who will provide Democratic gains. And those gains will be because of high turnout and activism among the most loyal Democrats AND because independent/moderate voters overwhelmingly supported the Democrats this year. TO BE CLEAR, it is absolutely true that the liberal activists and the base in the Democratic Party (not always the same thing) deserve tremendous credit for the successes that Democrats will enjoy.

REPUBLICANS LOST THIS ELECTION. DEMOCRATS DID NOT WIN IT.  Wrong.
 Republicans have certainly screwed up, no doubt.  They have really opened the door for Democrats to walk through, but they haven't picked the Democrats up and carried them across the threshold. Senator Chuck Schumer, who runs the Democrats' Senate campaign committee, has outraised the Republican Senate committee.  Nancy Pelosi has unified and guided her caucus for the last two years and no one -- no one -- in the Democratic Party would have been better for the job chairman of the House Democrats' campaign committee than Congressman Rahm Emanuel.  The Democrats recruited stronger candidates, demanded that they meet regular organizational and fundraising benchmarks, exploited Republican mistakes by jumping on them quickly, and competed at least dollar-for-dollar on fundraising.  

Some conventional wisdom is right.  For example, this election is about change nationally, not about local issues only.  Also, many believed that the Republicans had the ability to close the differences in polling as Election Day approached because most undecided Republicans would come home.  All this is true. It just goes to prove, though, that conventional is right only half the time -- and nobody knows which half.



Display:


Re: Conventional Wisdom Scorecard / Getting Thru T (none / 0)

Well, in terms of messaging I do think the Dems have not made the deal, and that Republicans failures will help us.  But you are right about the nuts and bolts things.  Our party leaders have raised the money and recruited good candidates.

I liked your assessment about how 10% of the districts does not a national election make.


Better Progressive Messaging www.progressivemovement.net
by parmenides on Tue Nov 07, 2006 at 09:42:48 PM EST

Donnie, here is the deal. (none / 0)

Show me accounts where the blog took the MAIN credit for getting candidates elected. All the gnashing over the establishment in the Lieberman case was precisely because many bloggers knew the limitations in reach the blogosphere has in 2006(it will only increase in reach with each passing year). We wanted the establishment to step in and help out Lamont because many bloggers on the left and many of the base knew candidates like Lamont could not beat an incumbent easily without the help of the establishment. WHAT WE REALLY COMPLAIN ABOUT WHEN WE TOUT THE POWER OF THE BLOGS is the reverse is also true. You will get Nader Florida like reoccurrences if the establishment keeps ignoring the base. Laura Swarz has gone on record asking (paraphrasing) "Where else will the liberals go?"

When Lamont loses, you will see people attributing Lieberman's victor to his centrism deepite the fact that no conservative or "centrist" dem would have fared any better against Lieberman.. But when Ford loses, he gets a pass? Ford was hilariously trying his best to appeal to "moderates", and did it help him win it? Sure he is doing no worse than if a liberal ran. But I thought the establishment likes to say results count . He is going to lose for sure.

Webb played it smart. He is a true moderate who does not pander. If he loses, I won't like it, but I can accept it as George Allen was touted for PResident not too long ago and it was one of Webb's guys that really burst the whole Allen Presidential bubble.  I don't think anyone else would have done any better than Webb. And Webb did it his way without taking cheapshots at liberals. Wbb's candidacy is proof that the blogosphere doesn't have purity tests for their candidates.

As far as the Iraq war not considered a main issue, I blame the democrats for that. They failed to show in clearer terms how much of an oppportunity cost the war had on other domestic ventures. People in the netroots knew the opportunity costs. To the average voter in states like CT, the war was a major issue, but they bought the argument that is was just one issue instead of taking into account all the subissues involved.  People like Lamont made that point, but repetition is the KEY. Democrats need to learn to formulate a clear message and repeat it.


by Pravin on Tue Nov 07, 2006 at 10:27:49 PM EST

Webb could have used more help (none / 0)

While the netroots are not yet kingmakers, they have shown they can be effective delivering their niche. If people like Schumer didnt create a US vs Them mentality by taking forever to change his mind about endorsing the winner of the Dem primary in CT, maybe there would have been a lot more effort in VA. As it is, Webb got good press on the liberal blogs(indicating that we have a big tent, personally I am more of a Cenk Uyger type moderate).

Just imagine if bloggers didnt have to expend so much energy on CT thanks to obstacles set by the dem establishment. You dont think the netroots could have gotten Webb at least 3-5000 votes?

Oh, Harold Ford. I dont begrudge the fact that we had a conservative candidate in TN because a Lamont like candidate probably doesnt win there anyway. BUt it doesn't feel so bad when a guy like Harold Ford who tried his best to look "moderate" from a republican POV and the MSM was trying to use him as an example of a new successful democrat and Lamont as a fringe guy, tastes defeat despite having good poll numbers before the racist ad by the repubs. This shold be a lesson to all the rght wing appeasers in the dem party. You are an outsider to them.


by Pravin on Wed Nov 08, 2006 at 12:48:35 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.